“Yet again, the court is called upon to decide whether the purported holder of a
note allegedly transferred into a securitized mortgage pool has standing to obtain relief
from the automatic stay. Yet again, the movant has failed to demonstrate that it has
standing. To make matters worse, the movant filed its motion without evidentiary support of its claim, attempted to create such evidentiary support after the fact, and only
disclosed its “real” evidence on the day of the final evidentiary hearing. The relief will be
denied.”
http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Tarantola.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment