Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Sen. Feinstein sought $25 billion for a gov't agency that had awarded lucrative contract to her husband's real estate firm.


On the day the new Congress convened this year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband's real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms, the Washington Times reported on Tuesday.

Mrs. Feinstein's intervention on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was unusual: the California Democrat isn't a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the agency is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments - not direct federal dollars.

Documents reviewed by The Washington Times show Mrs. Feinstein first offered Oct. 30 to help the FDIC secure money for its effort to stem the rise of home foreclosures. Her letter was sent just days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) - the commercial real estate firm that her husband Richard Blum heads as board chairman - had won the competitive bidding for a contract to sell foreclosed properties that FDIC had inherited from failed banks.

About the same time of the contract award, Mr. Blum's private investment firm reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission that it and related affiliates had purchased more than 10 million new shares in CBRE. The shares were purchased for the going price of $3.77; CBRE's stock closed Monday at $5.14.

Spokesmen for the FDIC, Mrs. Feinstein and Mr. Blum's firm told The Times that there was no connection between the legislation and the contract signed Nov. 13, and that the couple didn't even know about CBRE's business with FDIC until after it was awarded.

Senate ethics rules state that members must avoid conflicts of interest as well as "even the appearance of a conflict of interest." Some ethics analysts question whether Mrs. Feinstein ran afoul of the latter provision, creating the appearance that she was rewarding the agency that had just hired her husband's firm.

Continue reading at the Washington Times

2 comments:

airJackie said...

Feinstein has been doing this for many many years. Using her position to get her husband millions. Now she got caught and got the get out free pass because Bush was President. But she's at it again. Time for Diane Feinstein to retire and take her stolen money with her. I'm waiting for the record to show how much Pelosi's husband's been collecting. Nancy is so scared she stays drunk. Now when we had the San Diego Fires Bush and Feinstein were suppose to be viewing the fire but they quickly left back to Washingon as Feinstein quickly gave her public support for Muskasy for AG. Now many knew she made a deal during that trip and it will come to light soon.

KittyBowTie1 said...

Hey, she can go to Costa Rica instead of Blago, who does not get to go.

The cat wanted to see Blago suffer in the jungle. :-(