Timeline: AIG and the bonuses.

(h/t Propublica)

March 2008 -- AIG agreed to the retention bonuses . The company's bets on mortgage-backed securities had already started to sour, forcing AIG to take a $5 billion hit.

Sept. 16, 2008 -- The government "rescued" the company with Bailout I -- an $85 billion loan.

Sept. 22, 2008 -- The company notified the Securities and Exchange Commission -- a week after the first bailout -- that the retention bonuses program had come into effect. Approximately 130 executives would get the first installment in December 2008, and the remainder in December 2009.

Oct. 9, 2008 -- AIG executives go on a "junket" at a California resort .

Oct. 22, 2008 – New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo obtained an agreement from the company not to pay bonuses from a specific fund to executives in the Financial Products unit.

Nov. 10, 2008 -- The government and AIG announced Bailout II – bringing the amount to $152 billion .

Late November 2008 -- AIG agreed to suspend bonuses for certain executives, including CFO David Herzog. At the same time, though, the company was reportedly promising retention bonuses as part of its efforts to recruit new hires for its subsidiaries in Asia.

Dec. 1, 2008 -- Congressman Elijah Cummings wrote to AIG CEO Edward Liddy, asking for full information about the retention bonuses, calling the program a "slight of hand" to get around the company's promise not to pay performance bonuses.

Jan. 27, 2009 -- Cummings spoke up again, telling Bloomberg that he was "extremely disappointed -- but not surprised -- to learn that AIG will be awarding bonuses to the very division that drove the company into the ground."

Early March 2009 -- AIG announced a $61 billion loss, the biggest in corporate history. The government agreed to Bailout III -- an additional $30 billion from Treasury. March 11-12, 2009 -- An Obama administration official told Reuters that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner only found out about the bonuses last Tuesday, called AIG to protest them on Wednesday and told the administration on Thursday.

In a nutshell, a lot of retention bonuses talk was under the Paulson-Bush Administration watch and not under Obama-Geithner watch. The Party of No are simply focusing the blame on Geithner to sidetrack the public on the real problem. But, I agree that Geithner and his small staff should not allow any more slip-ups on future corporate banks that ask for bailouts to have them to expose directly and upfront any bonuses and compensation plan. More importantly, a restriction of bonuses should be implemented in a bill immediately so that this doesn't happen again. I notice that the media and The Party of No hadn't mention that Cuomo got an agreement by AIG now former CEO to not to pay bonuses from a specific fund to executives in the Financial Products unit which the same unit that receive 1 million dollar bonuses. Did Liddy missed the agreement between Cuomo and the former AIG CEO? There was a lot of empty promises of rention bonuses to Congress from AIG under the former CEO in which the current CEO Liddy inherited. Liddy has to understand that the taxpayers are his new boss and he has to answer to the taxpayers for his actions.