Wednesday, October 31, 2007

RUDY/RUDIA LOWERS THE DISCOURSE




Seriously folks, Rudy has been spending too much time in the evidence room in New York with Bernie, the great commish snorting coke and meth… I mean, we call it fried brain...


AP via Breitbart:




He argued that had the U.S. not invaded Iraq, it would now be facing two dangerous countries trying to become nuclear powers—Iraq and Iran.

“Suppose Hillary Clinton and John Edwards’ new position was their position back then, that it was a mistake to take him out,” Giuliani said, referring to former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. “Wouldn’t we be dealing with Saddam Hussein becoming nuclear right now? If Iran was becoming nuclear what would he be doing? Sitting there letting his arch enemy gain nuclear power over him? Or would we now be dealing with two countries seeking to become nuclear powers.”

On Iran, Giuliani criticized Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., also a candidate for president, for saying they would engage in diplomatic relations with Iran. Obama has said he would be willing to meet with Iran’s leader in the first year of his presidency without conditions; Clinton has said envoys below the presidential level should begin diplomatic work.

“This is the world we live in. It’s not this happy, romantic-like world where we’ll negotiate with this one, or we’ll negotiate with that one and there will be no preconditions, and we’ll invite (Iranian President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad to the White House, we’ll invite Osama (bin Laden) to the White House,” Giuliani said.




Read more



Historians may one day debate Rudy Giuliani’s recent preposterous comments at a New Hampshire town hall meeting. “Did he mean it?” they might ask. “Or was he just dehydrated?” While addressing voters, the candidate said that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were debating whether to invite Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Osama bin Laden to their inaugurations.



But wait, there’s more.


Giuliani insisted that the “mission” in Iraq is without a doubt the correct one, and the Democrats and history will eventually come to that view. Without the war, he warned, Saddam Hussein would have had nuclear weapons:



“Wouldn’t we be dealing with Saddam Hussein becoming nuclear right now? If Iran was becoming nuclear what would he be doing?”


Apparently he would be waving his magical nuclear arsenal wand and threatening the United States.


Seriously, this man wants to be president, and he’s justifying the invasion and occupation of a country—not to mention the continued loss of lives and treasure—with a stale lie and a retroactive hypothetical.


(h/t: Daily Dish)

1 comment:

airJackie said...

Rudy has no idea of what he's saying. He is only in this for the money. If the Republican base with their Christian values vote for a cross dresser that's it for religion. Looking at some of your post SPB, Rudy might not make it to the primarys if he's charged with collecting money from his business and his connections with the NY Crime Family.