TPM:
If there's a burning question that's arisen from Brent Wilkes' trial, it's not whether Wilkes is guilty. It's: 'Just how stupid is Duke Cunningham?'
According to testimony, Cunningham's (alleged) bribers were in agreement: his stupidity made him an easy mark. Wilkes' former employee testified that Wilkes told her Duke was "not the brightest congressman up there. We can work with him.”
And Mitchell Wade told jurors that Wilkes and Wade considered him to be “of below-average intelligence.” So while the unending stream of bribes kept Cunningham willing to do whatever the defense contractors wanted, you couldn't just tell him to go harass Pentagon officials because they weren't paying the bills. Wade said that the lawmaker was so thick that they had to "spell out for Duke exactly what he had to say."
4 comments:
"Not the brightest congressman up there." I bet the helpers could write a book--"Being a Congressman for Dummies."
Look at the Gerbil, and he's president.....a high intelligence level obviously is not a requirement for running a country, at any level.
Ummm, having a low I.Q. is probably a requirement for public office, not a high I.Q.
"Ummm, having a low I.Q. is probably a requirement for public office, not a high I.Q."
I know. Real sad, huh?
Post a Comment