Monday, July 20, 2009

Bank 'walkaways' from foreclosed homes are becoming a troubling trend

Wow. How sad.

Renetta Atterberry thought she had lost her East 102nd Street house. So she was shocked to learn in January -- five years after her mortgage company filed for foreclosure -- that it was still in her name.

Worse, the long-vacant rental home had been vandalized and she faced a raft of housing code violations. Since then, she has been saddled with debts of about $12,000 to pay for demolition and back taxes.

"I thought I had nothing else to do with that home," said Atterberry. "I was so embarrassed and humiliated by this."

Her mortgage company didn't buy the house and never took it to sheriff's sale to see if somebody else would, leaving Atterberry the legal owner, responsible for upkeep and taxes.

These so-called "bank walkaways" are another troubling development in the foreclosure crisis, particularly in cities like Cleveland with weaker housing markets, say housing advocates and government officials.

Lenders or mortgage companies decide they don't want homes they have already foreclosed on, sometimes because the value has plummeted or they believe the homes could become costly liabilities if they are socked with housing code violations.

But without that sale, the property can languish abandoned and ripe for vandalism. As liens and liabilities mount -- creating a so-called "toxic title" -- it becomes even harder to transfer the property. Neighborhoods and local governments are left to deal with the mess.

"It's a growing issue. It's all over the state. It's not just Cleveland," said State Rep. Mike Foley. "That kind of lack of respect for communities that banks have made a ton of money off of in the past is infuriating."

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yes, many banks are becoming unintentional landlords which is very costly.
If these banks would work with people to say on hardship, and interest only or some temporary modification, it would cost them less in the long run.

People want to keep thier homes and there is pride of ownership. At least the grass will be cut etc.

In most cases, this would be more cost effective if they can get people to pay something ...the banks would save the heating, lights, maintenance, be it yard etc, and still have some money coming in instead of all of it going out (as in expenses to the banks etc.).