The United States District Court for
the Northern District of California granted class certification in a mortgage
loan appraisal suit alleging defendants conspired to inflate appraisals to
increase the sale of loans in the secondary market. The Court found that plaintiffs presented sufficient
evidence to establish common questions of fact and law, holding that common
questions and answers need not uniformly apply to all class members. The Court
also found that the analysis of individual appraisal fees would not create
individualized issues, but instead would provide additional support for
plaintiffs’ claims that an inflated appraisal scheme existed. Finally, the
Court also held that the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act’s treble
damages, attorney’s fees and government enforcement mechanisms did not make
class action an inferior method of litigation.
Click here for the opinion. (Document 249)
—
Case5:08-cv-00868-RMW Document197 Filed05/25/10 Page1 of 33
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
FELTON A. SPEARS, JR. and SIDNEY
SCHOLL, on behalf
ofthemselves and all
others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FIRST AMERICAN
EAPPRAISEIT,
(alk/a eAppraiseIT,
LLC),
a Delaware limited
liability company,
Defendant.
CLASS ACTION
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION,
MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
AND MEMORANDUM IN
SUPPORT
DATE: July 2, 2010
<excerpts>
CASE FILE California Class Action
No comments:
Post a Comment