Fox News Panel Says Obama Can't Negotiate With Iran Because of Election Results. But They Said The Same Thing Last Year!
It's possible that Brit Hume's statements on Fox News Sunday show he's getting forgetful in his later years. How else to explain it when he so solemnly says Obama can't engage with Iran because of the unrest over the election? After all, he was saying the same thing last year! Via Media Matters:
WALLACE: So, a fiercely fought campaign in Iran; results that show that Ahmadinejad won in a landslide. And now we have people in the streets, supporters of the more moderate challenger, Mousavi, saying that the election was stolen. Brit, where does this leave things inside Iran?
HUME: Well, it looks as if Ahmadinejad will cling to power. He is supported by the key elements of the theocracy that runs that country. Whether these protests will grow or spread is in doubt. They seem to have subsided today after all of the trouble they had yesterday.
I think it leaves Iran about where it was, but showing the world an even clearer picture, as if any were needed, this is basically a police state. And it is difficult, therefore, to see how President Obama's dreams of a more constructive relationship with the powers that be there can go forward, given the fact that this election appears to have been defective if not utterly fraudulent. I mean, after all, Mousavi -- Ahmadinejad is, according to the results, was supposed to have carried Mousavi's hometown by a large margin.
See, Brit's kind of a broken record. Here's what he said in May 2008:
WALLACE: Brit, you made it clear that you think that, on substance, that Obama's wrong. The idea of holding these meetings without preconditions is a bad idea.
Obama goes back and says, "Look -- look at the Bush policy over the last seven years. Has that made Iran weaker or stronger?" Isn't that a fair point on his --
HUME: It's a fair point, but who says it isn't -- who can seriously argue that if President Bush had had some kind of meeting and direct negotiation with [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad that that would have -- would have weakened Iran's aggressive posture in some way?
That makes no sense. In fact, what it would have done would be to elevate this slightly crazy guy who says these unbelievably nutty things to the level of a world statesman, which his present situation does not suggest he is.
Now, some people on the Obama side will say, "Well, you wouldn't really meet with him. You might meet with one of the mullahs." Oh, that would be -- that's a great idea.
I mean, you just stop and think about it. When you sit down at a table with somebody, you expect them to offer you something, but you have to offer them something in return. It's not for the point -- it's not for the purpose of just having a nice chat and getting to know one another.
Joe Scarborough Blames Obama's Cairo Speech for Ayatollahs Rigging Iranian Election--But That's a Good Thing
If they rigged the election Joe, it's likely for the same reasons the Republicans have rigged elections in the United States...to stay in power. Not because they're worried about American politics.
GREGORY: Let's just also address what is the still breaking news out of Iran, and the fact that there is belligerence coming out of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Iranian regime.
MURPHY: Yeah.
GREGORY: And this administration has a real delicate balance here...
MURPHY: Well...
GREGORY: ...which is are you going to engage? And how do you do it now?
SCARBOROUGH: Right. And how fascinating; we heard the vice president--I mean, they've been looking at the numbers. Did you hear the old, the old Irish pol looking at us, saying, "You know, 70 percent of the vote came from urban areas. That's not Ahmadinejad's strong suit." They know these numbers don't add up. I mean, that's a very--I think that's the strongest message this morning. Joe Biden suggested this morning the numbers just don't add up in Iran.
GREGORY: Right, that Iran is not an actual democracy here.
MURPHY: Well, and I hope that's not news to them.
GREGORY: Yeah.
MURPHY: I mean, behind the--he kept referring to the supreme leader, the Grand Ayatollah, who really pulls the strings there. And now the Iranian democracy, the legitimacy is out the window in the eyes of the world.
GREGORY: Right.
MURPHY: So these are bad guys of no good faith. How do you engage with them if obviously they don't mean much of what they say?
Continue reading »
1 comment:
Sarah wants Americans to give her the job as President of the United States even if she's as dumb as a door knob. No matter the facts are true and Bristol is an unwed teenage mother and alcoholic and Todd is an alcoholic. We have no problem with Talk Show host calling our President/First Lady racist comments and insighting murder. Let's see how far Sarah takes her headlines.
Joe Scarborough is thinking about running for elected office again. Yes Scarborough who covered up the murder of his employee and currently has a warrent for back taxes will get back in Politics. Now this is one reason why the GOP is doing so bad. But who knows Americans might want a murder/tax dodger in office. Just think in 2012 we might see President Limbaugh or Newt and VP Sarah Palin. We can welcome Foley and all the other Republicans back in office to continue the mission. If G-Rod can hold on he might have his case dismissed as corruption pays in America. I know Wall Street and Big Business will be glad to have the US Treasury back and watch the Saudi's come back for their share. Looks like Pottersville isn't that far away if the Republicans have their way.
Post a Comment